New Ask Claude or ChatGPT about any stock, using Bullpen. Bullpen in Claude or ChatGPT. 7 days free
Bullpen.News From Edwin Dorsey
Get Daily Recap Feedback

Thursday, November 12, 2026

Back to the front page

From X

@kevin__mak

Kevin Mak on X

$CMPS Announced their completed NDA submission this morning at 6:30AM, which I think implies they sent it late last week or over the weekend. So that puts them about a week after Usona (reportedly, not confirmed) send theirs in. I wonder with the two applications so close together whether they announce their approvals (or rejections/CRL’s) at the same time? Also if they announce Usona first, I wonder if the market reads that through to CMPS. (Vice versa doesn’t matter since Usona isn’t publicly traded) Interesting times ahead. Will post more substantively about my thoughts on commercialization as we move closer to approval and beyond. Disclosure: Creek Drive and its affiliated funds holds a long position in CMPS. Views expressed are current opinions for information only, subject to change and are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Investing involves the risk of loss and past performance is not indicative of future performance. See the disclosures link in my bio for more important information.
@convequity

Convequity on X

Huawei's "N3-equivalent" label on the Kirin 9050 Pro is a transistor density comparison with $TSM's N3, not a claim of equal manufacturing technology. A node name such as 3 nm no longer measures a physical feature on the chip. It is an industry label for a rough range of transistor density. N3-equivalent means the Kirin 9050 Pro packs about as many high-density logic transistors into each square millimetre as TSMC's N3 does. A conventional chip builds all its transistors on a single tier of silicon. The Kirin 9050 Pro stacks two tiers, and Huawei's roadmap goes to four and then eight. Each doubling of tiers doubles the maximum density on the same footprint without finer lithography, the printing step that sets how small features can be and where Huawei is most constrained. In our view the shipping chip proves logic folding is commercially real, and the second tier is what makes the N3 density comparison credible. The same mechanism limits the claim: Huawei reached N3 density by stacking, so the label is a density claim, not a claim that Huawei can print transistors as small as TSMC's.
@BlueDuckCap

BDC on X

Evan, it's disingenuous to offer Waymo as evidence of an instance where they should NOT have raised external capital. Fact is, $GOOGL Search is one of the most profitable and dominant businesses of all time supporting billions of cumulative earnings, FCF, and trillions in market cap. The margin for error at $SNAP is much thinner; the cumulative score card at SNAP measured by stock price, is not even in the same universe as $GOOGL. Sure they could have funded Waymo internally. Maybe they should have. But SNAP is not GOOGL. Not even in the same conversation.
@StableBread

Fajasy on X

Rising memory chip prices are hitting Toast’s $TOST hardware business, so the restaurant software and payments company has been buying chips early. $TOST’s hardware and professional services gross loss widened to $85M in Q3 from $57M a year ago, and the $225M lost through September already tops the $220M lost in all of 2025. It doesn’t help that hardware revenue was flat at $45M while hardware costs rose 29% to $130M. Management has tied that pressure to rising memory chip prices, which are largely outside Toast’s control. What $TOST can control is when and how it buys, and that’s exactly what it’s been doing. It’s been buying memory chips early, which took inventory from $114M (as of December 31, 2025) to $244M (as of September 30), with another $191M of hardware purchases committed over the next 12 months. President and CFO Elena Gomez said on the Q3 call that “nothing has really changed” since the Q2 call, when she said Toast had already cut the expected memory cost for both 2026 and 2027 by using earlier hardware generations, cheaper memory, and spot-market buying. $TOST also started buying Toast Capital loans from its bank partner and holding them itself in 2026, buying $145M through September after none in the first nine months of 2025. Gomez said that lets Toast keep the full return instead of just a fee for arranging the loans. But Toast now also takes the loss when a restaurant doesn’t repay, just as the FTC challenges its practice of making the full loan due when a customer cancels. So far, Gomez says defaults are “within our expectations,” and most new loans will still go through Toast’s existing program rather than its own balance sheet.

Investor Letters

All letters

DoorDash’s FBA Moment

DoorDash’s $17 billion Instacart deal targets DashMart warehouse scale, where 99%+ order accuracy and faster delivery address the limits of…

DASH $78BKR $41B
MBI Deep Dives 2 clicks

Cat-Scratch Fervo

Fervo Energy raised $2 billion in its May IPO, then fell nearly 70% below issue price after a Morpheus short report, despite targeting 1 GW…

FRVO $3.8B
Doomberg 4 clicks
OSW · short

One Spa World

OneSpaWorld (OSW) faces about 37% downside as its valuation requires unattainable growth in average revenue per customer after major-market…

OSW $3.1B
Value Investors Club

Sea Ltd Earnings Update: Q3 2026

Sea Ltd reported Q3 2026 revenue of $8.6 billion, up 43.4% year over year, while net income rose 34.0%.

SE $45B
SixSigmaCapital: Navigating the Financial Markets 6 clicks

Publications we follow

Every publication on this site, hand-picked.

130 publications

Newsletters 110

YouTube 4

Blogs 15

Seeking Alpha 83 of 286

Nominate a publication

X accounts we follow

Every account on this site, hand-picked.

91 accounts
Nominate an account

Investor letters we follow

375 firms

Sectors

Ordered by how often our editor reaches for them.