Laughing Water Capital on X
Friendly reminder that $MRK is well positioned and well incentivized to purchase $LQDA. Yutrepia fits very well with Merck's respiratory portfolio. https://t.co/JAdLguTw7D
X
Laughing Water Capital
Everything we have picked from this writer, newest first.
Laughing Water Capital on X
NN says joint testing has been needed for two years and alleges opposition has resisted it.
Laughing Water Capital on X
GSK reportedly made three bids for AnaptysBio over the past year, making the trial outcome a potential determinant of sale price rather than a barrier to a deal.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@FriendlyCapMgmt @thecontracap there have been some things i view as negative for $ANAB and some that are positive. but in my view in order to make this investment you have to focus on the future cashflows, not the trial.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@cfrischer1 The use cases for satellite part 15 are extremely limited, & to suggest this is bad for $NN is silly. If there is interference or not is the only thing that matters whether on land or in space.
Laughing Water Capital on X
ANAB could sell its royalty stream if it loses, preserving future cash flows despite a stock decline. The board added RPRX’s former CFO four months earlier.
Laughing Water Capital on X
GSK and AnaptysBio face a collaboration-contract dispute after the GSK manager overseeing the $ANAB partnership said GSK violated the agreement.
Laughing Water Capital on X
AnaptysBio’s contract-law position against GSK could preserve Delaware’s longstanding approach to contractual disputes.
Laughing Water Capital on X
GSK’s position in the ANAB dispute could let acquirers disavow a purchased subsidiary’s obligations, a result characterized as catastrophic for Delaware contract law.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@darkstarsats @JoesAutopen @cfrischer1 @CalgaryLeveen @mil01425146 @SteveCrowley Probably for the same reason the opposition has submitted reports that need to break the laws of physics in order to suggest interference. $NN
Laughing Water Capital on X
@snack8812 @CalgaryLeveen Hi - could you explain why you think the "admin in office" is against $NN? Is this just because of the OIRA delay? Or are there other reasons? TYIA
Laughing Water Capital on X
GSK faces a July 14 trial over Jemperli, with AnaptysBio claiming rights that could restrict PD-1 partnerships. The dispute could end in a settlement or acquisition.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@darkstarsats 2/x) $NN can play a video for congress of them running tests right outside the capital building, or maybe even inside, and say "see, no interference."
Laughing Water Capital on X
@darkstarsats 1/x) the point is that next time $NN is front of congress, when the opposition claims interference, Miriam can say "congressman, did you notice your key card not working?" "Sergeant at Arms, were there any issues w/ electronic security?" etc etc
Laughing Water Capital on X
I think there is signal value here. No way the FCC runs $NN tests at the literal capital building unless they have sign-off from the highest levels. To much risk of this being labeled a “stunt” unless the FCC and higher powers are strongly supportive. https://t.co/Eaxyu0UbS4
Laughing Water Capital on X
@darkstarsats @dylan_ascencios @dan_tmt and why would anyone have to retool antennas or receivers when almost all (but not all) Part 15 are center tuned to 915, which $NN doesn't want. Why are 10 Mhz around 915 not enough when EU and China do it with 5 or 6 MHz?
Laughing Water Capital on X
The 907-918 MHz Part 15 allocation is compared with smaller European and Chinese bands for similar devices.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@mil01425146 @darkstarsats Hudson and Guthrie have both been vocal supporters of the need for terrestrial backup to GPS/PNT. Hudson has even spoken at the same events that $NN CEO Sorond has spoken at. This is bullish.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@scottwilsonUSD @cfrischer1 just more of the same. no effort to explain why US RFID/part 15 needs all of lower 900 when the rest of the world functions fine with much less, & ignoring that $NN is meant to be just part of a system of systems.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@scottwilsonUSD @cfrischer1 Womack is seemingly in $WMT's pocket & claiming $NN will interfere with RFID. However, $NN has the proof that they do not interfere with RFID, so presumably Womack will go away.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@JoesAutopen yes - it is on Carr. The same Carr who has surely seen the real world testing that $NN has done, and still submitted a draft NPRM. Is it your belief that the real world data was negative, and Carr chose to purposefully put his head on the chopping block?
Laughing Water Capital on X
SpaceX, Amazon and mobile network operators may compete for $NN’s low-band spectrum, creating an extreme upside case if several parties need the asset.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@CalgaryLeveen @cfrischer1 @sScCrRaAbBLLeE 5/x) I'd argue that @BrendanCarrFCC is incentivized to move forward quickly now too, unless he wants to allow $WMT to dictate how the FCC does its job through their congressman, whom they no doubt generously support.
Laughing Water Capital on X
@CalgaryLeveen @cfrischer1 @sScCrRaAbBLLeE 4/x) i'd bet RFID would drop their objections to $NN's plan in exchange for licensed status in 907-918 (or 908-917Mhz). Seems like a fair compromise to provide terrestrial backup to GPS in the U.S. for free.
