Bullpen.News From Edwin Dorsey
Get Daily Recap Feedback

Thursday, October 29, 2026

Back to today

Another Haircut with Avy the Barber

SoFi’s stock case hinges on interest rates, tangible book value and private-credit loan sales after its $1.5 billion equity offering.

SOFI $22B
WHAT ARE WE DOING? “Contrarians At The Gate” 3 clicks

From X

@calvinblissett

Calvin Blissett on X

I'm sorry it's a pretty bold claim "a better $NVR" I should elaborate. Cury looks like NVR transplanted into a structurally tighter housing market, with even stronger current unit economics. On an apples-to-apples S&P Global methodology, Cury generated 84.2% ROIC in 2025 versus 47.0% for NVR, while Cury's inventory turned 3.77x versus NVR's 3.26x. (https://t.co/pMkkNhSOWD). ROIC is preferable here to ROE or EPS because NVR's enormous buybacks reduce shares and equity and can make per-share growth and ROE look better. The opportunity set is also more extreme: Brazil's official housing deficit is 5.77 million homes, equal to 7.4% of occupied households, while Freddie Mac estimates the U.S. shortage at 3.7 million units against roughly 150.8 million housing units, or ~2.5% of housing stock. FJP Cury then concentrates affordable housing in São Paulo and Rio, precisely where affordability and housing scarcity are most acute because these are the richest cities in Brazil, while using land swaps, customer presales and subsidized MCMV financing to keep remarkably little of its own capital trapped in each project. The result is basically the feature that makes NVR exceptional pushed further: Cury currently turns each real of invested capital substantially harder, while operating against a relative housing shortage several times larger than America's.
@StableBread 1 click

Fajasy on X

My bear, base, and bull cases value Boost Run’s $BRUN stock on year-end 2026 ARR (on the same basis as the multiples of CoreWeave $CRWV, Nebius $NBIS, and $IREN), which $BRUN will report with its Q4 results in March 2027. None of the three cases adds the $160.7M/year from the July order and Cohere, since both start in 2027. The peers’ contracts that start after 2026 aren’t in their year-end ARR either, so they’re priced into the multiples instead. Since the peers’ multiples leave out the debt they’ll take on to reach year-end ARR, I hold $BRUN’s net debt at today’s $244.3M, rather than adding the lease debt from its H2 2026 build. Each case’s value is year-end ARR times the multiple, minus the $244.3M of net debt, divided by the 88.8M fully diluted shares plus any new shares from a stock sale. I start with the $231.4M of ARR from contracts already running, then add (1) the June order’s $69.2M/year if it starts by December 31 and (2) however much of the $99.4M from contracts without disclosed terms is running by then. Bear case ($4.76, -46%) The bear case assumes $BRUN has no new financing to show by its Q3 report, lessors fund 70% of the H2 2026 build instead of 79.5% (below the 72.0% lessors funded in 2025), and the June order’s November 30 start slips into 2027, so 2026 GPU spending stays at the $1.0B low end of management’s range. That implies year-end ARR of $280M, 30% short of the target, a $62.2M stock sale at $8.89/share (7.0M new shares) to cover the funding gap and three months of 2027 payments, and today’s 2.5x, for a value of $4.76/share. I give the bear case about a 20% chance. Base case ($16.17, +82%) The base case assumes $BRUN lands new lease or asset-backed financing by year-end, starts the June order on November 30, and reaches its $400M target without selling stock. That implies $400M of year-end ARR at CoreWeave’s 4.2x, the median of the three peers, for a value of $16.17/share. I use today’s median, since the base case only solves $BRUN’s own financing problem. It assumes no relief on rates or borrowing costs, which would lift the peers’ multiples too. Bull case ($19.78, +122%) The bull case assumes everything in the base case, plus relief on rates and borrowing costs that lifts the peers’ multiples. That implies $400M of year-end ARR at 5.0x, still below Nebius’s 5.9x, for a value of $19.78/share. So the bull case is really a bet on the market, not on anything more from $BRUN. From $8.89/share, you’re risking a $4.13 loss (-46%) in the unlikely bear case for a $10.89 gain (+122%) in the more likely bull case. P.S. These cases use the October 16 close and predate $BRUN’s October 26 release, which says it has closed more than $600M of non-dilutive project financing in 2026.
@convequity 2 clicks

Convequity on X

Investors are selling $BESI, in our view, because customers increasingly prefer or consider shorter HBM stacks, since HBM is expensive. Our industry information points to customers requesting stacks of four or six memory dies. Fewer layers mean fewer connections and, where hybrid bonding is used, fewer bonding steps per stack, and shorter stacks fit package-height limits more easily with conventional solder. That could delay equipment adoption and weaken the nearer-term HBM opportunity for $BESI, which supplies hybrid-bonding equipment. Logic folding is the tailwind. It places parts of a circuit above one another on vertically connected layers joined through hybrid bonding, so signals travel shorter distances and the chip runs faster on less energy. Those benefits hold even when an inference system needs less HBM, and the layers still need aligning and connecting with exceptional precision. In our view, that can create more hybrid-bonding demand than this delay takes away. Wider folding also pushes inspection and measurement into more logic-chip applications. We expect that to lift spending faster than chip volumes for $ONTO and $CAMT, and for $NVMI, whose materials and chemistry checks address problems that get harder as circuits move into vertically connected layers. Longer term, folding could make chips on established processes more capable for $UMC. That is our prospective thesis, not an announced UMC program. Deeper dive available at Convequity.
@convequity 1 click

Convequity on X

$AVGO could find it worthwhile to stand behind the chips in Anthropic's $63bn financing if the chip sales it enables are profitable enough. On October 26, $BX and three banks announced $63bn of committed financing for a new special purpose vehicle. The vehicle buys AVGO AI accelerators and networking equipment and leases them to Anthropic. Deliveries are expected from calendar 2027 under a compute agreement AVGO had already announced. The debt has two layers. First-lien lenders have the first claim on the vehicle's assets if it defaults. Second-lien lenders are paid from whatever remains after them. The banks arrange the first lien. BX is the sole provider of the committed portion of the second lien. AVGO provides residual value support to the vehicle for an amount equivalent to the first-lien portion, meaning it stands behind the future value of the equipment for that amount. The release gives no loan split and no payment terms. Reuters, citing two people familiar with the deal, puts the first lien at about $43.5bn, or 69% of the total. The support is a promise about the equipment's future value, and the conditions under which AVGO would pay are not disclosed. Its economic cost to AVGO is a weighing of how likely a payment is and how large it could be. A second factor is the cash or borrowing capacity AVGO has to keep available to honor the promise while it stands. If the promise lets Anthropic finance chips it would otherwise have delayed or not bought, and if those chips sell at a profit, the gross profit on them belongs to AVGO. Gross profit means the sale price less the cost of making the chip, before research and other operating costs. Whether any sales are extra in that sense is not disclosed, and neither is the deal's gross profit. That comparison explains why a chip vendor could take a risk a lender might refuse. A lender earns interest and fees on the loan. AVGO could earn the profit on the extra chips as well, and if that profit outweighs the likely payments and the cost of keeping capacity available, the support adds value for AVGO. The weak point is that the costs and the profit move together. The equipment loses resale value when demand for AI accelerators falls, and AVGO's own chip sales would fall in the same conditions. BX's second lien sits below the senior layer that AVGO's support is sized to. BX is therefore lending mainly against Anthropic's ability to pay its leases. Reuters reported on October 16, citing the Financial Times, that Anthropic was then offering BX a yield above 10% on $9bn of debt backed by five-year lease payments. Reuters could not verify that report, and the final yield is undisclosed. If other lenders are charging more for AI lease risk, or declining it, BX gets paid for taking it. Whether that pay covers the risk depends on lease terms that are not public. The same reasoning can apply further up the supply chain. A supplier could stand behind the value of its own equipment if its gross margin on a deployment is large enough to cover the likely payments, it has the capital to keep available, and the support terms are ones a lender can enforce. If credit for AI data centers stays tight, that is one way the buildout keeps getting financed, with suppliers carrying part of the risk that their own hardware loses value.

Investor Letters

All letters

My Last GFL Update - Hopefully

GFL’s take-private structure hinges on BC Partners rolling 60% of its stake to preserve debt portability under the 40% permitted-holder…

GFL $16B
310 Value’s Newsletter 5 clicks

Are Neoclouds Dead?

Neoclouds face tighter debt financing as AI infrastructure capex outruns cash flow, leaving cash-burning GPU providers more exposed than…

NBIS $46B
Daniel Romero 9 clicks

Reddit: Deep Dive Analysis

Reddit generated $805 million in Q2 2026 revenue, 95% from ads, but slowing Google search referrals expose AI-driven traffic and…

RDDT $26B
Hated Moats 6 clicks

Publications we follow

Every publication on this site, hand-picked.

129 publications

Newsletters 109

YouTube 4

Blogs 15

Seeking Alpha 67 of 267

Nominate a publication

X accounts we follow

Every account on this site, hand-picked.

91 accounts
Nominate an account

Investor letters we follow

190 firms

Sectors

Ordered by how often our editor reaches for them.