New Ask Claude or ChatGPT about any stock, using Bullpen. Bullpen in Claude or ChatGPT. 7 days free
Bullpen.News From Edwin Dorsey
Get Daily Recap Feedback

Sunday, November 15, 2026

Back to the front page

From X

@StableBread

Fajasy on X

Bulls N’ Bears, an Australian investment news site, called American West Metals’ $AWMLF new exploration target at its Storm copper project in Arctic Canada a “monster maiden exploration target.” The maiden exploration target estimates 110-214Mt @ 0.59-1.02% copper outside the current resource, or 646,000t to 2.2Mt of contained copper (2.3-7.9x Storm’s 276,000t resource). An exploration target is a range of what an area could hold before there’s enough drilling to estimate a resource, and $AWMLF calls its own “conceptual in nature.” Here’s where the seven target areas sit relative to Storm’s existing deposits (in red), with Chevron ~30km south in the inset. But most of the target rests on Storm’s existing deposits used as templates, or on little to no drilling: → Deeps Zone and Central Graben (345,000-777,000t): Assumes three more deposits the size of Cyclone, Storm’s largest, one below Cyclone and two in the Central Graben, backed by 14 widely spaced holes. → SE Stratabound and SE Structural (164,000-369,000t): Sized from three existing deposits (Chinook, Lightning Ridge, and Corona) ±20%, assumed to repeat down to ~300m below surface, plus nearby ground tested by 17 broadly spaced holes. → Tornado (95,000-859,000t): Largely unexplored ground 5km east of the deposits, where the two intercepts the release lists grade just 0.12-0.14% copper. → Chevron (14,000-123,000t): ~30km south of the deposits, with no holes drilled yet. The best intercepts in the Deeps Zone and Central Graben also start more than 300m down the hole, far deeper than the open pits the pre-feasibility study (PFS) plans. Even the extensions of the existing resource (28,000-64,000t), the part of the target closest to the deposits, grade 0.53-0.80% copper, below the reserve’s 1.2%. Managing director Dave O’Neill plans to develop Storm first and fund growth from it, since an operating mine “is expected to significantly reduce the costs of exploration,” he said in the release. So I don’t attach any value to the exploration target. It shows where $AWMLF plans to drill and run geophysical surveys in 2027, but little of it would add years to the PFS mine.
@convequity 1 click

Convequity on X

Reflections on $NVDA's corporate governance after Jensen Huang's exit 1) It is strange that the CIA and the government ran the rumored China spy investigation without notifying Nvidia's board and Jensen first. The matter had been brewing for several quarters, and the news only broke after the mid-term election. 2) Jensen should have asked for a bigger stake in Nvidia, just as Elon Musk did at $TSLA. Elon set an outlandish long-term stock price target with a vesting schedule tied to it, and that gave him more control and more ownership. 3) Dual-class share structures, where the founder's shares carry extra votes, are rare among established semiconductor firms. This lack of founder voting control is a common issue across semiconductor companies. Jensen seems to have been too focused on technology and too little on politics and control. 4) Where Jensen goes next is the open question. We hope Nvidia gets him back in some way, or Elon hires him, or he finds another place to thrive. Age 63 is just the start for him. We hope he perseveres through this storm and thrives. The worst case is that he retires into a VC-like role, but we don't think he will settle for that at this stage. 5) In the best world, NVDA shareholders would vote to bring Jensen back and fire what we see as a woke board. We think that is unlikely. Share ownership is widely distributed and the investor base is very diversified. Many of those investors do not follow the company or its governance closely, so they are hard to mobilize. And the board was not constructed as thoughtfully as the one Elon built, after he suffered the same problem early in his PayPal years. 6) Those who said founder control, vision and ownership don't matter to the Nvidia business will feel they are right, and buying the dip will look great in the short term. We think they will be proven wrong over the longer term. 7) This is a great time for $AVGO, $AMD and $CBRS. But note that Broadcom and AMD have similar governance issues too.

Investor Letters

All letters

Q3 Earnings Updates

Q3 updates cover Crocs, Entravision and Fiserv beats, coal and oil weakness, and Xerox’s sharp decline, testing the underlying cases for…

CROX $7.5BEVC $874M
Hidden Rock Capital's Newsletter 2 clicks

The Spy Who Shagged The Market

Nvidia’s leadership scandal puts its AI-market role under scrutiny, with comparisons to AIG’s pre-GFC liquidity influence.

AIG $43B
WHAT ARE WE DOING? “Contrarians At The Gate” 4 clicks

Is Nebius Fucked?

Nebius’ Q3 beat relied on $325 million of one-off partnership fees as it raised 2027 CapEx to $40–45 billion and may need $6–11 billion of…

NBIS $32B
Daniel Romero 6 clicks

Publications we follow

Every publication on this site, hand-picked.

130 publications

Newsletters 110

YouTube 4

Blogs 15

Seeking Alpha 87 of 294

Nominate a publication

X accounts we follow

Every account on this site, hand-picked.

91 accounts
Nominate an account

Investor letters we follow

376 firms

Sectors

Ordered by how often our editor reaches for them.